Optimal control of a system in a changing environment

Driver:

ActiveLearning

Download script: changing_environment.m

The target of the study is show how to control a system that depends on environment parameters such as temperature or humidity. While the environment parameters can be measured, their influence on the system’s performance is often unknown.

As an example objective the 2d Rastrigin function

\[r(x_1, x_2) = 10\cdot 2 +x_1^2 + x_2^2 - 10\cos(2\pi x_1) - 10\cos(2\pi x_1)\]

is considered. The environment parameter \(\phi\) acts as an additional phase offset to the first cosine function in the objective function

\[r(x_1, x_2, \phi) = 10\cdot 2 +x_1^2 + x_2^2 - 10\cos(2\pi x_1 + \phi) - 10\cos(2\pi x_1)\]

The phase shall slowly vary over time as

\[\phi(t) = 2\pi\sin\left(\frac{t}{3{\rm min}}\right).\]

Please note, that this specific time dependent behaviour is not exploited and is assumed to be unknown.

Before being able to control the system in an optimal way depending on the environment, one has to learn for many environment values, where the global minimum is located. To this end, a standard Bayesian optimization is performed for 500 iterations that explores the parameter space. In a second phase, the target is to evaluate the system in an optimal way, i.e. an exploration of the parameter space is not desired. This behaviour is mainly enforced by choosing a small scaling value.

The control phase could have an arbitrary number of iterations and it would be problematic to add all new observations to the study. On the one hand, this slows down the computation time of a suggestion. Since the environment value changes during the computation, this can lead to less optimal evaluation points. On the other had, adding more and more data points close to each other leads to an ill conditioned Gaussian process surrogate. To avoid these drawbacks, data points are not added in the control phase if the study predicts a value with very small uncertainty, which means that the observation would not add significant information.

  1client = jcmoptimizer.Client(); 
  2
  3%Rastrigin-like function depending on additional phase offset phi 
  4function val=rast(x1, x2, phi)
  5    val = 10*2 + x1^2 + x2^2 - 10*cos(2*pi*x1 + phi) - 10*cos(2*pi*x2);
  6end
  7 
  8%time-dependent slowly varying phi
  9function phi=current_phi()
 10    t = now()*1e5;
 11    phi = 2*pi*sin(t/180);
 12end
 13 
 14% Definition of the search domain
 15design_space = { ...
 16    struct('name', 'x1', 'type', 'continuous', 'domain', [-1.5,1.5]), ...
 17    struct('name', 'x2', 'type', 'continuous', 'domain', [-1.5,1.5]) ...
 18};
 19
 20% Definition of the environment variable "phi"
 21environment = { ...
 22    struct('name', 'phi', 'type', 'variable', 'domain', [-2*pi, 2*pi]) ...
 23};
 24
 25 % Creation of the study object with study_id 'changing_environment'
 26study = client.create_study( ...
 27    'design_space', design_space, ...
 28    'environment', environment, ...
 29    'driver','ActiveLearning',...
 30    'study_name','Optimal control of a system in a changing environment',...
 31    'study_id', 'changing_environment');
 32
 33% In the initial training phase, the target is to explore the
 34% parameter space to find the global minimim.
 35study.configure( ...
 36    ... train with 500 data points
 37    'max_iter', 500, ...    
 38    ... Advanced sample computation is switched off since the environment
 39    ... parameter phi can change significantly between computation
 40    ... of the suggestion and evaluation of the objective function
 41    'acquisition_optimizer', struct('compute_suggestion_in_advance', false) ...
 42);
 43
 44% Evaluation of the black-box function for specified design parameters
 45function observation = evaluate(study, sample)
 46
 47    pause(2); % make objective expensive
 48    observation = study.new_observation();
 49    % get current phi
 50    phi = current_phi();
 51    observation.add(rast(sample.x1, sample.x2, phi), 'environment_value', {phi});
 52    
 53end  
 54
 55% Run the minimization
 56study.set_evaluator(@evaluate);
 57study.run(); 
 58
 59
 60% The target in the control phase is to evaluate the offet Rastrigin function only
 61% at well performing (x1,x2)-point depending on the current value of the environment.
 62MAX_ITER = 500; %evaluate for 500 additional iterations
 63study.configure( ...
 64    'max_iter', 500 + MAX_ITER, ...
 65    ... The scaling is reduced to penalize parameters with large uncertainty    
 66    'scaling', 0.01, ...
 67    ... The lower-confidence bound (LCB) strategy is chosen instead of the
 68    ... default expected improvement (EI). LCB is easier to maximize at the
 69    ... risk of less exploration of the parameter space, which is anyhow not
 70    ... desired in the control phase.
 71    'objectives', {...
 72        struct('type', 'Minimizer', 'name', 'objective', 'strategy', 'LCB') ...
 73    }, ...
 74    'acquisition_optimizer', struct('compute_suggestion_in_advance', false) ...
 75);
 76
 77% keep track of suggested design points and phis at request time and evaluation time
 78design_points = {};
 79phis_at_request = {};
 80phis_at_eval = {};
 81            
 82iter = 0;
 83while not(study.is_done())
 84    iter = iter + 1;
 85    if iter > MAX_ITER
 86        break
 87    end
 88        
 89    phi = current_phi();
 90    suggestion = study.get_suggestion({phi});
 91    phis_at_request{end + 1} = phi;
 92    sample = suggestion.sample;
 93    design_points{end + 1} = [sample.x1, sample.x2]; 
 94    try
 95        obs = evaluate(study, sample);
 96        %update phi from observation
 97        phi = obs.data.None{1}.env{1};
 98        phis_at_eval{end + 1} = phi;
 99        
100        predictions = study.driver.predict({[sample.x1, sample.x2, phi]});
101        std = sqrt(predictions.variance(1, 1));
102            
103        fprintf("Uncertainty of prediction %f\n", std);    
104        % add data only if prediction has significant uncertainty
105        if std > 0.01
106            study.add_observation(obs, suggestion.id);
107        else
108            study.clear_suggestion( ...
109                suggestion.id, sprintf("Ignoring observation with uncertainty %f", std));
110        end
111            
112    catch err
113        study.clear_suggestion( ...
114            suggestion.id, ...
115            sprintf("Evaluator function failed with error: %s", err.message) ...
116        )
117        rethrow(err);
118    end    
119
120end
121            
122
123fig = figure('Position', [0, 0, 1000, 500]);
124 
125% all observed training samples
126observed = study.driver.get_observed_values();
127subplot(1, 2, 1)
128plot(observed.means,".")
129hold on;
130xline(500, '--');
131xlabel("training+control iteration")
132ylabel("observed value of Rastrigin function")
133
134%observed values during control phase
135observed_vals = [];
136
137%values that would have been observed at request time,
138%i.e. if there would be no time delay between request and 
139%evaluation of suggestion
140observed_vals_at_request = [];
141
142for i = 1:length(design_points)
143    observed_vals(i) = rast( ...
144        design_points{i}(1), design_points{i}(2), phis_at_eval{i});
145    observed_vals_at_request(i) = rast( ...
146        design_points{i}(1), design_points{i}(2), phis_at_request{i});
147end
148
149%best value of x1-parameter depending on environment
150function val = best_x1(phi)
151    val = -phi/(2*pi);
152    if abs(phi) > pi
153        val = val + sign(phi);
154    end
155end
156
157% best possible values 
158best_vals = [];
159for i = 1:length(phis_at_eval)
160    phi = phis_at_eval{i};
161    best_vals(i) = rast(best_x1(phi), 0, phi);
162end
163
164subplot(1, 2, 2)
165semilogy(observed_vals,".", 'DisplayName', 'observed values')
166hold on;
167semilogy(observed_vals_at_request,".", 'DisplayName', 'observed values if no time delay')
168semilogy(best_vals, 'DisplayName', 'best possible values')
169ylim([1e-4, 1e1])
170xlabel("control iteration")
171legend()
172saveas(fig, "training_and_control.png")
173
174client.shutdown_server();
training and control

Left: During the initial training phase in the first 500 iterations, the parameter space is explored leading to small and large objective values. In the control phase, only small objective values are observed. Right: The observed values (blue dots) agree well with the lowest achievable values (green line). Most of the deviations are due to the time offset between the request of a new suggestion for a given environment value \(\phi\) and the actual evaluation of the Rastrigin function about a second later. To see this, the values that would have been observed at the time of request are shown as orange dots.